# Round 2 disposition

Input SHA-256: c6b6d31763afcf7a276b854da8cabad02ff4828e5dca2debcde31be0acd47479.
Both reviews completed with exit 0 and nonempty reports.

## Opus

- F1: accept stdin source binding and explicit disclosure. Preserve streaming; do not prebuffer or restrict input.
- F2: accept identical one-time dispatch and revalidation for all external UI actions. Ask the user whether Little Snitch Deny requires biometrics. That UX choice is pending; no automatic temporary-rule substitution.
- F3: accept explicit threat-model limitation for other processes with Accessibility/Automation grants. Do not revoke any existing grants.
- F4: accept dedicated service-account transport and a narrowly scoped service-private transport-key fallback. Preserve stronger credential-recipient protection and independent authority signatures.

## Kimi

- Finding 1: accept a bounded GUI outcome watchdog and explicit unknown state after permit consumption. Require old actor reconciliation before resubmitting.
- Finding 2: accept an expired-dialog entry with explicit refresh/recapture. No repeated automatic notifications.
- Finding 3: reject automatic privileged copying as UX-neutral. Program relocation can change path/resource/loader semantics and therefore cannot be an unconditional fallback. Clarify the existing feasibility gate and its required output: actual atomicity guarantees and a user decision on any semantic or security compromise. This is scheduled platform investigation, not an assertion of a working atomic mechanism.

Review convergence remains pending the user's concrete Little Snitch UX choice and another review of the revised plan.